Meta-analysis of randomized trials: Evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
Podcast
Podcaster
Beschreibung
vor 16 Jahren
Background: Single-agent gemcitabine ( GEM) is a standard treatment
for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines
the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further
improve treatment efficacy. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed
to evaluate randomized trials comparing GEM versus GEM+X ( X =
cytotoxic agent). Fifteen trials including 4465 patients were
eligible for an analysis of overall survival, the primary end-point
of this investigation. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a
significant survival benefit for GEM+X with a pooled hazard ratio (
HR) of 0.91 ( 95% CI: 0.85 - 0.97, p = 0.004). The overall test for
heterogeneity resulted in p = 0.82 ( I(2) = 0%). The analysis of
platinum-based combinations indicated a HR of 0.85 ( 95% CI: 0.76 -
0.96, p = 0.010), while for fluoropyrimidine-based combinations the
HR was 0.90 ( 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.99, p = 0.030). No risk reduction
was observed in the group of trials combining GEM with irinotecan,
exatecan or pemetrexed ( HR = 0.99). A meta-analysis of the trials
with adequate information on baseline performance status ( PS) was
performed in five trials with 1682 patients. This analysis
indicated that patients with a good PS had a marked survival
benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy ( HR = 0.76; 95%
CI: 0.67 - 0.87; p < 0.0001). By contrast, application of
combination chemotherapy to patients with an initially poor PS
appeared to be ineffective ( HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90 - 1.29, p =
0.40). Conclusion: The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated
a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with
platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary
subgroup analysis ( representing 38% of all patients included in
this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS
appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas
patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from
combination chemotherapy.
for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This study examines
the question whether GEM-based combination chemotherapy can further
improve treatment efficacy. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed
to evaluate randomized trials comparing GEM versus GEM+X ( X =
cytotoxic agent). Fifteen trials including 4465 patients were
eligible for an analysis of overall survival, the primary end-point
of this investigation. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a
significant survival benefit for GEM+X with a pooled hazard ratio (
HR) of 0.91 ( 95% CI: 0.85 - 0.97, p = 0.004). The overall test for
heterogeneity resulted in p = 0.82 ( I(2) = 0%). The analysis of
platinum-based combinations indicated a HR of 0.85 ( 95% CI: 0.76 -
0.96, p = 0.010), while for fluoropyrimidine-based combinations the
HR was 0.90 ( 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.99, p = 0.030). No risk reduction
was observed in the group of trials combining GEM with irinotecan,
exatecan or pemetrexed ( HR = 0.99). A meta-analysis of the trials
with adequate information on baseline performance status ( PS) was
performed in five trials with 1682 patients. This analysis
indicated that patients with a good PS had a marked survival
benefit when receiving combination chemotherapy ( HR = 0.76; 95%
CI: 0.67 - 0.87; p < 0.0001). By contrast, application of
combination chemotherapy to patients with an initially poor PS
appeared to be ineffective ( HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90 - 1.29, p =
0.40). Conclusion: The meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated
a significant survival benefit when GEM was either combined with
platinum analogs or fluoropyrimidines. Based on a preliminary
subgroup analysis ( representing 38% of all patients included in
this meta-analysis), pancreatic cancer patients with a good PS
appear to benefit from GEM-based cytotoxic combinations, whereas
patients with a poor PS seem to have no survival benefit from
combination chemotherapy.
Weitere Episoden
In Podcasts werben
Kommentare (0)